Opinion piece in NYT confirms once again Ainolabs bias about the immense usefulness of ML and fundamental futility of human equivalent AI.
“… there is no such thing as disembodied understanding. Your neural, chemical and bodily responses are in continual conversation with one another, so both understanding and experiencing are mental and physical simultaneously. “
It is quite possible that a silicon based entity reaches consciousness. It just won’t be human.
This is related to trying out GPT-3 for Ainolabs’ Mentor Bot. Very useful for specific purposes, hit rate for meaningful conversation is another thing alltogether.
You Are Not Who You Think You Are
Change is innovation 